Cosmos DB offers five tunable consistency levels that help developers control data behavior across multiple regions.
Each level provides a different trade-off between data freshness, performance, and fault tolerance. Choosing the right level depends on your application's specific needs and user experience goals.
This flexibility aligns with the PACELC model, which guides distributed system design.
By understanding how these levels work, developers can create applications that stay responsive, reliable, and scalable—even across global deployments.
Consistencies:
1. Strong Consistency
Strong consistency ensures that every read returns the latest committed write, eliminating stale or out‑of‑order reads.
Cosmos DB synchronously commits writes across all replicas—even across regions—to enforce this. While this guarantees absolute correctness, it increases latency and could reduce availability during failures.
Use strong consistency only when data accuracy matters most, such as in financial or inventory systems.
2. Bounded Staleness
With bounded staleness, reads may lag behind writes by a defined time window (T) or number of versions (K).
This level keeps updates in order but accepts a small delay, offering lower latency and higher availability than strong consistency.
It suits collaboration platforms, stock systems, or globally replicated writable regions that can tolerate slight staleness.
3. Session Consistency
Session consistency delivers a reliable experience within a single client session. It guarantees “read-your-own-writes,” monotonic reads and writes, and “write‑follows‑reads.”
Other sessions may see stale data, but performance remains strong. Cosmos DB uses session consistency by default, making it ideal for personalized scenarios like user sessions in e‑commerce or social interactions.
4. Consistent Prefix
Consistent prefix ensures that reads never return operations out of order. For example, if your app writes A, then B, then C, any read may return A, A–B, or A–B–C—but never skip or reorder operations. This level provides better throughput and availability while preserving order, making it suitable for event streams, activity logs, and ordered data workflows.
5. Eventual Consistency
Eventual consistency offers no order or freshness guarantees. Reads might return stale or out‑of‑order data until all replicas converge.
You gain maximum performance, availability, and throughput. Social feeds, IoT telemetry, or volatile product catalogs often operate effectively under eventual consistency.
Choosing the Right Consistency
-
Strong: Use when absolute data accuracy is non-negotiable.
-
Bounded Staleness: Choose when you need globally ordered data with slight lag.
-
Session: Ideal for per-user consistency within a session.
-
Consistent Prefix: Use when order matters but freshness is flexible.
-
Eventual: Go for this when performance and throughput outweigh strict consistency.
Account‑Level vs. Request‑Level Consistency
You set the default consistency level at the account level, and you can override it at the request level using SDKs or headers.
This flexibility enables your application to handle different workloads dynamically maintaining strong consistency where needed while prioritizing performance elsewhere.
By understanding how each consistency level trades off performance, availability, and latency, you can tailor your distributed application to deliver responsive user experiences without compromising data integrity where it matters most.
Learn More – Official Microsoft Links
Comments
Post a Comment